Contents
1775 - the
year it all began
Oral History and an Act
of Bravery
Key Events of 1775
Chronology of the History of the
Canadian Postal Service
What if 1775 is important
because of the invasion of Canada
Interesting Additional Information
Text for this section is by
Benoît Long, webmaster for the Philip Long GENWEB, unless specifically
indicated.
Although this site is
specifically dedicated to the role and heroism of our ancestor Philip
Long in the American Revolution, we will not attempt to create a site
that repeats the history of the Revolution. There are many
valuable resources on the internet on the subject, and we will make
available a list of those resources that we have used or consider
important for any researcher to discover. We wish to refer the
reader to the On-Line Institute for Advanced Loyalist Studies where they
have an excellent chronology of the War but also have an immense library
on-line.
We reproduce here the section
of the letter from Philip Long to His Excellency, Lord Sherbrooke, dated
September 4th, 1816. Of particular note, given that this was an
error in the original manuscript from Mgr. Lang, his letter was
addressed to Lord Sherbrooke (Sir John Coape, a man with a distinguished
military career), a man that was known to Philip Long, and not to Lord
Drummond. We can only
imagine the circumstances of these men knowing each other in some
fashion. We will speculate on the origins of this acquaintance
when we reach 1811.

To help the reader and researcher, we reproduce here the key known
elements of Philip Long's career in the military. Given the above
letter , it is believed to have started in 1775:
-
he seems to have entered the service or
accomplished some acts in support of King and Country as early as
1775;
-
he never attained a rank higher than Private
in all his years of military service up to 1783;
-
he is known to have served with the following
Provincial regiments: with the New York Volunteers (1777) at
Paulushook, Long Island; the West Florida Foresters (1781) at New
Town, Long Island; and the Kings American Regiment (1781-1783) in
Savannah, Georgia and finally Long Island, New York;
-
because he was a member of Regiments that had
the above normal standing of Provincial Regiments (and in the case
of the KAR a Provincial Regular Regiment), Philip was able to hold
his rank and benefits after the end of the conflict in 1783; he
would therefore have received a small pension for his services;
-
it is believed that he was wounded in his
career, likely losing sight in one eye;
-
he was transported aboard the last ship that
left New York in September 1783 and reached Saint-John where he
continued his military service but in a new career.
In 1775, Philip Long is believed, again from oral
history as relayed by Mgr. Ernest Lang, to have engaged in an act of
bravery. It has been told and re-told in the family so many times
that we tend to believe that such an act did take place although we are
not certain of the exact nature of this act.
Given that this act is so important to many of
us, we wish to reproduce here the text of Mgr. Lang's book on the
subject:
"C'était au temps de l'éclatement de la guerre
de la Révolution américaince. En l'année 1775 eurent lieu les
premiers combats sanglants entre l'armée anglaise-britannique et les
soldats des patriotes américains. Notre future héros avait alors
18 ans....
Or voici que le jeune Philip Long entre en
scène. Assurément il faisait déjà partie de l'armée anglaise, donc
attaché à la cause de la Mère Patrie, l'Angleterre et à son roi, et voilâ pourquoi on le trouve du côté des Loyalistes....
Du côté des Loyalistes, Philip Long, jeune
hommme fort, robuste, âgé de dix huit ans seulement, connu pour sa
bravoure, son audace même, offrit ses services pour la fonction
d'éclaireur. Il fût alors envoyé dans le secteur le plus dangereux,
le plus surveillé par les sentinelles ennemies, afin d'y recueillir des
informations précieuses pour les siens.
Parti donc à l'aventure pour accomplir sa
délicate et ultra dangereuse mission, le jeune "éclaireur" tomba
à l'improviste sur un groupe d'émissaires ennemis, composé de soldats
patriotes et d'indiens au pied agile, transportant un précieux
colis (sac de malle) contenant des ordres secrets militaires envoyés à
leurs armés en campagne.
Vif comme l'éclair, le jeune éclaireur Philip,
que les soldats ennemis avaient pris pour un coureur des bois ordinaire
saisit le précieux "sac de malle", sous les yeux ébahis et stupéfiés des
gardiens, et s'enfuit avec la rapidité du chevreuil affolé, dans la
forêt épaisse de ces temps-là.
Il va sans dire que les indiens au regard
perçant, et au pied agile, ainsi que les soldats de farde ainsi
mystifies, saisis de fureur à la vue de ce qui venait de se passer sous
leurs yeux, se lancent à la poursuite du rapide éclaireur de l'armée
ennemie. Divisés en plusieurs escadrons, les pourchasseurs prirent
chacun une direction différente, bien déterminés à capturer le téméraire
ravisseur.
Mais dès le début de la fuite dans la forêt,
notre héros avait déjà pris une remarquable avance sur les ardents
poursuivants, et était hors d'atteinte immediate. Il erra dans la
forêt dense pendant trois jours et trois nuits, sans nourriture autre
que des petits fruits sauvages, escaladant montagnes et collines
abruptes, traversant ruisseaux torentueux et rivieres, sans se lasser,
pour échapper définitivement à la meute lancée à sa poursuite, et bien
déterminée à le capturer.
Malgre un épuisement total, notre héros de dix
huit ans, avec la joie sereine du triomphateur, livra son précieux colis
de dépêches, documents ultra secrets, à ses chefs militaires, leur
procurant d'innapréciables avantages.
Pour un coup d'audace, de bravoure, digne des
exploits des commandos de nos jours, c'en était un de taille."
Mon ancêtre Philip Long, Mgr. Ernest Lang,
P. D., Ateliers Marquis, Montmagny, 1987, pp.18-20.
There are many interesting parts to this story.
We certainly want to believe that this is in fact what occurred in those
early days of the Revolution. It is difficult to separate facts
from fiction in this tale, particularly because Mgr. Lang was so
enthusiastic about our ancestors accomplishments that the reader cannot
but feel the excitement that he felt writing those words.
One interesting part of this tale of course is
that our ancestor was already mingling with the mails perhaps as early
as 1775. We know that this was a focus of much of his career and
life. We can probably safely deduce that he was already engaged in
the delivery of the mails even in Provincial America in or around 1775
when the conflict began. We know that he was a member of
Provincial regiments that were in fact cavalry units and he would have
been very good with horses. In 1775 and prior to that date, the
mails were carried through an embryonic network that was organized
through and for military/government purposes. We have not undertaken a
systematic research of the organization or network of the postal system
at that time in the British Provinces but it may be an important source
of information that could point us to what life our ancestor may have
had. Of course, we caution the reader to the fact that his being
involved in the postal system is a supposition and is not at all an
historical fact. From the History of the Post Office in British
North America, 1639-1870 by William Smith, we understand that this
system of mails was critical to the colonies, that it represented a
strategic asset and channel of communication that was costly to operate
and maintain and required significant time and effort to keep open at
all times during the year.
We do not know the exact consequences of this
act of bravery by our ancestor. Did it change the course of a
battle? how significant was it militarily? from the words of
the Agents Deane and Kavanagh, what did the words "escaped to the British
with American mails" really imply? was Philip once a supporter of
the patriotic cause and this of bravery forced him to the British camp?
is there any evidence of similar acts in the war or at that time that
would or could be that of our ancestor?
These questions and many others have perplexed
researchers for many years and continues to this day to fascinate all of
us.
Mgr. Lang and my brother Ghislain always
maintained that this act in and of itself was sufficiently important to
have given Philip Long special privileges and recompense. We doubt
the validity of this view at this time given the facts of Philip life. Our
belief is that Philip Long did receive some esteem for his act but it did
not translate itself into any special title, position etc ... that we
have ever been able to ascertain. Certainly prior to 1783 there is
no such indication. After 1783, his knowledge of fairly important
individuals in the higher circles of the British military Council in
Quebec City is probably more happenstance than anything else. If
he served in the 4th Regiment (likely but being researched by Donald)
after 1783 for a time until he was employed fully as a courier between
Halifax and Quebec City, then he likely would have met Sir John Coape
who had command of the Regiment for a time. Coape would become
Lord Sherbrooke. As well, in his position at the head of the Lake
Temiscouata gave him ample opportunity to meet every important person
who traveled from Quebec to the Maritimes. As well, he was chosen
to settle at this particular location and that in itself demonstrates a
certain measure of respect for his abilities but in view of the
difficulties and suffering that this position brought to Philip and his
family, it is not clear this a great priviliged. Finally, Philip was likely known, appreciated
and noticed more specifically because he undertook to settle in a very
strategic location at the head of Lake Temiscouata. Everyone of
note, from Governors to Monseigneurs, lowly soldiers of the 104th
Regiment or travelers stopped or stayed at his lodgings. His and
his family's impact on the local history of Lower Canada is undeniable.
No one to our knowledge has found any evidence for
this act of bravery but we do believe that such an act did take place
given that its story is so specific and has remained relatively
unchanged for the last three generations (based on previous
conversations with Rosario Lang and Claire Masson).
Please refer to the following chronology of the
year 1775.
http://www.royalprovincial.com/history/chronology/chrono.shtml
The history of 1775 is obviously well remembered
for the shots that were fired at Concord and Lexington - famous for
"starting" the Revolution. In my family, we
have always understood that Philip Long would have been part of some
action in the Southern Provinces of the British colony which included
every State south of Vermont and New Hampshire down to Florida.
Therefore, all of our energies have been spent locating Philip's
birthplace from known US origins, that is, Philadelphia, anywhere in New
York, and even (for a time), Virginia, North/South Carolina and Georgia.
These locations have been reasonable assumptions on our part but have
yet to bear the long awaited fruit.
But what if ....
Philip Long does mention the year 1775 but not
the context or events that made it momentous. He was writing to
Sir John Coape, a man who had had a distinguished military career and
was now Lord Sherbrooke. We easily draw the conclusion that he is
referring to the events of 1775 in the context of the the start of the
War, particularly as he is later to be represented as an American
Loyalist. However, the real first large scale conflict of this
Revolutionary War actually took place also in 1775 but not on American
soil. The campaign to take Canada was one of the first and best
organized events to further that objective. If it had succeeded,
it would have totally reversed the fortunes of the war, and certainly
changed forever the history of the people of Canada as we know it today.
However, it did fail. Is it possible that in the context of
writing to the Governor of Canada in 1811 that Philip Long was actually
referring to the effort, and his part in it, to thwart the campaign to
Quebec City and Montreal?
If this was the case, could it mean that our
ancestor was actually a member of the (a) postal system in the Northern
Province rather than the the Southern Provinces, or (b) a member of the
military in the Northern Province already or, (c) a resident of the
Northern Province who got embroiled in the conflict after participating
in some fashion in the Northern campaign on the side of the British?
Unfortunately, such conjectures are only helpful
if they us build credible scenarios about his likely / possible origins.
Research continues.
Chronology of the History of the Canadian Postal Service
-
Muster Rolls of New York Provincial Troops 1755-1764 by The
New York Historical Society. 1891 (source: Donald Long)
http://longislandgenealogy.com/MusterRolls/MainIndex.html
|